020707 Marc Morano’s Round-up

July 1, 2007, 5:00 am News

July 2, 2007

Another prominent scientist joins skeptics - Co-founder of Doppler Radar dismisses mankind's role - Says 'no one really knows' cause of global warming

Chief Meteorologist at News 9 Gary England Full bio: http://newsok.com/article/903060/

Excerpt: "An examination of ice core data is frequently used as proof that CO2 heats the atmosphere. A close examination of that data shows that the air temperature went up first and then the CO2 went up. Mars is loosing pole ice faster that earth is loosing the same. As someone said recently, "It's the Sun stupid!" Recent research suggests that the activity of our Sun combined with cosmic radiation from far outside our galaxy interact with our atmosphere to produce effects never dreamed of a few years ago. Is anything or everything in this paragraph correct? No body really knows."

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/298630/no_one_really_knows_on_global_warming.html

Yet another scientist debunks global warming fears as having  'lost its foundation in real science'

Below is from Botanist David Bellamy. Bellamy also wrote a recent scientific report entitled “ Climate stability: an inconvenient proof” which can be accessed here:http://www.thomastelford.com/journals/abstract.asp?JournalTitle=Proceedings%20of%20ICE,%20Civil%20Engineering&ArticleID=5801&JournalMenu=true&JournalID=10

Expert: There are no facts linking the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide with imminent catastrophic global warming there are only predictions based on complex computer models.

http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=1

IPCC expert reviewer and climate skeptic Dr Vincent Gray”: “WHEN IS A “PREDICTION” NOT A PREDICTION?

Excerpt: The "Summary for Policymakers" for the IPCC  "Climate Change 2007" keeps to this definition. All their "forecasts" are called "projections": But it is obviously dishonest, as they have ignored that part of their own definition which says that "projections" are "subject to substantial uncertainty" when they ascribed 90% probabilities to several "projections" and consider that some "projections" can be "virtually certain".

http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=1

New scientific research refutes many of Gore's climate claims

Excerpt: Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, ''An Inconvenient Truth,'' have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them. Gore can show sincerity in his plea for scientific honesty by publicly acknowledging where science has rebutted his claims.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article

Local Minnesota TV affiliate examines global warming debate (Very fair program)

The Climate Change Case: From an hour-long special on KSTP-TV, St. Paul, MN, on June 26, 2007

Video version:

 http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/s121988.shtml

An audio version - 57 minutes

 http://hermanohme.com/climate/

/

NOAA and the Three Monkeys – Stonewalls on Freedom of Info request

http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1796

A PREVENTABLE TRAGEDY: Environmentalism run amok creates growing tinderbox

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/01/INGMVQNLIQ1.DTL&feed=rss.opinion

CEI comments on EPW Climate Hearing: “Thieves Fall Out”

http://www.openmarket.org/2007/06/29/thieves-fall-out/

Global warming controversy generates heat Scientists challenge prof

http://www.madison.com/tct/news/199677

$1.5 million grant to Study to examine carbon balance in Western U.S.

http://www.bendweekly.com/Science/7879.html

Next Post Previous Post