The most dishonest statement in the IPCC "Climate Change 2007 is as follows:
“A common confusion between weather and climate arises when scientists are asked how they can predict climate 50 years from now when they cannot predict...
"According to Bertrand Russell, 'the whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts'. Unfortunately, we expect our politicians to have all the answers, and our politicians expect likewise from their advisers. So we get...
Eminent US climatologist Richard Lindzen questions the efficacy of climate science. In particular, he shows how political bodies act to control scientific institutions, how scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions, and how opposition to these positions...
Let us assume global warming is happening. Let us assume too that it is doing so at a rapid pace. What should we do about it? There are two very basic approaches. Either we can attempt to mitigate the problem by direct or indirect means, or we can go with the flow, and adapt to a warmer world. Let's...
The supposed evils of uranium mining and nuclear power are used by the Greens to frighten the populace into supporting them. Also, and to a greater extent, their "Theory of Cataclysmic Global Warming" does the same thing. Scare mongering is a forte of the radical environmental movement, who believe...
"IPCC does not have ambition to present an objective climatic situation, but rather 'to shock' the people to take actions which would bring no climatic effects (NIPCC, 2008) , but rather di...
A new paper by Lord Monckton concludes: "Some reasons why the IPCC’s estimates may be excessive and unsafe are explained. More importantly, the conclusion is that, perhaps, there is no 'climate crisis', and that currently-fashionable efforts by governments to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions are p...
"There is no evidence, neither empirical nor theoretical, that carbon dioxide emissions from industrial and other human activities can have any effect on global climate. In addition, the claims so often made that there is a consensus among climate scientists that global warming is the result of incr...
"We are also led to believe that Chapter 9 [of 2007 IPCC report] was widely supported by hundreds of reviewers, but just 62 IPCC reviewers commented on its penultimate draft. Only five of those reviewers endorsed it but four of the five appear to have vested interests and the other made just one co...
"The greenhouse effect is the underpinning science for the hypothesis of dangerous global warming from increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide caused by human activities. If we cannot get the underpinning science as a clear and logical construct then the edifice is no more than a house of cards! Also,...
"I can not know what the trajectory of the climate system will be well enough to advise policy makers on what specific course it will take, or well enough to help them know what they could possibly do to tweak it toward a direction deemed 'safe,'..."But I do believe that the accumulating economi...
"A general update due to subsequent developments (especially the current 2 year global cooling trend and a quieter sun with cooling oceans after an 8 year temperature plateau which tends to show that my point about solar and oceanic influences on global temperatures has some merit)" - Stephen Wilde...
Dr James Lovelock, the English scientist who was one of the first to embrace the global warming hypothesis tells Radio New Zealand's "Morning Report" that our Emissions Trading Bill is a "waste of time". LINK to hear broadcast
Distinguished Canadian climatologist, Dr Timothy Ball, explains why and how news media have misrepresented claims about the state of Actice sea ice. This analysis is a superb backgrounder for anyone wanting to know the facts about the Arctic and the changes that have occurred in its ice volumes.
LI...
| ![ACT](http://www.act.org.nz/s... |
"The atmosphere - carbon dioxide, methane, whatever - does not function like a greenhouse in our gardens....Why do we continue to propagate the nonsense of the ‘greenhouse’ analogy?” UK Professor Philip Stott. LINK
A 'must-read' by Christopher Booker in the UK Daily Telegraph. As well as the article, read the comments posted below it, including the correction by Tom Harris about the origin of the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change.